Hiring the right document examination expert witness is important because documents used for a lawsuit often contain crucial details. Documentation is a valuable form of record in terms of legal claims, so the authenticity of such evidence must be verified before reaching a legitimate conclusion in the event of litigation.
There are various methods of examining documents, including determining the authenticity of handwriting and signature verification. Questioned and fraudulent documents can be detected by verifying the legitimacy of handwriting and whether it matches with the individual said to have written or signed the document. No matter which tool was used, whether it was paper and ink or typewriting, there are methods in place for discovering forgeries and fraud in both current and historical documents, including the examination of paper and ink analysis.
Document examination can be a crucial tool in maintaining identity security, as fraudulent documents can be connected to identity theft, so a document examiner may be needed to verify the disputed authorship of such documents. These methods can also be used to confirm the authenticity of autographs, wills, deeds, anonymous documents or letters, checks, account ledgers, and medical records. Document examiners may also be used to discover authorship in graffiti-related crime.
Documents can be vital pieces of evidence in the event of a court case, so the role of a document examiner is very important. ForensisGroup has spent over twenty years building a substantial list of qualified experts from a variety of fields. Browse through our extensive selection today and Submit An Expert Request Form or call us for further information on retaining the best available document examination expert witness for your case.
I have over 10 years of consulting experience in appraisals with an emphasis in valuation of personal property. My areas of expertise include: art market research to determine valuation of personal property, cataloguing and examining art objects, preparing analysis and report documentation, database management using filemaker, microsoft excel and word, editing, proofing appraisal documents, interacting with clients and field experts, developing business relationships, and invoicing and billing using quickbooks. I am offering my services as a personal property appraisal expert witness.
The Virginia Department of Elections brought a motion to exclude the testimony of a proposed election expert witness for the plaintiffs—three individuals and two voluntary associations affiliated with the Republican Party of Virginia. The lawsuit challenged the constitutionality of the Incumbent Protection Act, which provides certain elected officials with the power to choose the method of nomination used to select their political party's nominee for office.The ExpertThe expert was a Professor of Public Policy, Political Science, and Law at the University of Southern California. Prior to joining USC, he taught at the University of Virginia for 10 years. His work focused on legislative politics and political parties and included more than 40 articles in peer-reviewed journals. The expert disclosure indicated that he would testify about the nomination process under state law and the Plan of Organization of the Virginia Republican Party, the structural advantages enjoyed by incumbent office holders, and the additional advantages conferred to incumbent officeholders.In forming his opinions related to this case, the expert relied heavily on rational choice institutionalism—a theory that posits that political outcomes are the product of preferences and institutions. Pursuant to this theory, the expert opined in his declaration that Virginia incumbents "have the ability to assess how they would perform under the different nomination methods and choose the one that they believe maximizes their chances of reelection." He stated that "the mere existence of the Act ... disadvantages challengers and benefits incumbents."Chief U.S. District Judge Michael F. Urbanski wrote in his opinion that in the question of whether a witness is qualified to testify is “context-driven and can only be determined by the nature of the opinion he offers,” citing Fourth Circuit precedent.Defendants argued that the expert should be excluded because his testimony was irrelevant and wouldn’t be helpful to the trier of fact. They argued that he lacked the requisite familiarity with the state electoral procedures at issue and that his definition of a "closed primary" contradicted the definition employed by federal courts in controlling cases.In support of their first argument, Defendants argued that the expert's academic background on national politics was inapplicable to this case, and he didn’t review sufficient Virginia-specific materials in forming his opinions. Defendants argued that the expert attempted “to parlay his research and familiarity as an expert on national politics into an expert opinion on Virginia election procedures and state party dynamics.”Plaintiffs responded that the election expert's expertise in rational choice institutionalism allows him to opine as to how those general principles apply to the facts of this case. According to plaintiffs, "courts do not require narrower and narrower sub-specialization ... in order to admit expert testimony into evidence."Defendants also argued that the expert didn’t sufficiently prepare to form his opinions on the subject matter of this case, which further revealed his lack of familiarity with the state’s electoral system. In preparing, the expert reviewed state election law (including the Act), forms promulgated by the Department of Elections, and other Party documents related to the selection of nomination methods. According to Defendants, those materials didn’t provide enough background on which the expert could have reliably formed his opinions. They contended that the expert should’ve reviewed other specific materials.Rule 702The judge reviewed the expert's proposed testimony, his qualifications, and preparation. He concluded the elections expert was qualified under Rule 702. As Defendants recognized, the expert had "significant experience with national political science." His proposed testimony applied general principles of rational choice institutionalism to the electoral procedures at issue. His testimony showed his familiarity with the Act and the Plan, he said, along with the sources at the center of the controversy. Although the expert didn’t consider every bit of evidence that Defendants considered important, "one need not be precisely informed about all details of the issues raised or even have prior experience with the particular subject the testimony concerns," Judge Urbanski wrote, quoting an earlier Circuit decision. Consequently, the judge found that the expert possessed the requisite background as a political scientist and adequately reviewed case-specific materials to offer his proposed testimony on the election issues in the case.Defendant also argued that the expert used a definition of a "closed primary" that was more restrictive than the definition relied on in Supreme Court cases, and therefore, this portion of his testimony wasn’t relevant. Because the expert's view of what constitutes a closed primary was more restrictive than the descriptions used by federal courts, Defendants argued that such a disagreement requires the court to exclude his testimony as irrelevant. However, Judge Urbanski disagreed.Defendants cited no authority for the proposition they sought to establish—that expert testimony is irrelevant if the witness disagrees with federal courts' definition of a term that describes an electoral procedure. But even assuming the definition of a "closed primary" amounts to a legal conclusion, the judge held that the experts' testimony would be admissible because it would help the trier of fact in resolving this case. Any disagreement over the definition of terms went to the weight of his testimony, not its admissibility. The expert' testimony about closed primaries wasn’t to be excluded.Finally, the conclusion to admit the expert's testimony was further bolstered by the fact that this case demanded a bench trial. The Daubert standards apply less stringently when the proposed expert testimony won’t be considered by a jury, the judge explained. While the lower Daubert standard wasn’t determinative here, Judge Urbanski said that it strengthened his conclusion that the testimony was admissible under Rule 702.
I am an expert in forensic document examination with over 30 years experience. My expertise includes conducting scientific examinations of handwriting and physical examinations of documents to establish genuineness or spuriousness. I also have experience with providing case review, on-site inspections, written reports, lecturing and training personnel in document examination, fingerprint processing and photography. I have also provided consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony to numerous clients as a forensic document examination expert witness for more than 30 years.
I have over 30 years experience in Computer Science & Engineering with expertise in source codes, machine translation, pattern recognition, document analysis, electronic voting systems, and bioinformatics. I have provided deposition, consultations, and courtroom testimony as a computer science engineering expert witness for more than 5 years.
I have over 30 years experience as a latent print examiner with expertise in analyzing, comparing and evaluating, and identifying latent finger and palm print evidence from crime scenes; in fingerprint detection with powders (regular, magnetic and fluorescents) and the application of chemical techniques for visualizing latent prints and other blood protein development stains for latent print visualization; and in the recovery of friction skin (i.e., finger, palms, soles) from decomposed, mummified, burned, and macerated bodies in death investigations. I have additional knowledge in computerized fingerprint identification systems, including The NEC Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS); the Western Identification Network (WIN); the FBI Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS); and, The Phoenix Group AFIX Tracker system (a localized AFIS system for tracking and searching latent prints). I am offering my services as a fingerprint analysis expert witness.
My experience in financial and forensic accounting has spanned over 30 years. My expertise includes revenue recognition, qui tam matters, false billing, falsification documentation, kickbacks and bribery, embezzlement, FCPA violations, conflicts of interest, unbundling of services, upcoding, and time/cost allocation. I have also consulted with clients regarding the development and implementation of fraud prevention, deterrence and detection techniques and programs, including anti-corruption compliance.
I have over 20 years experience in Forensic Document Analysis with expertise in signature and handwriting analysis, altered and counterfeit examinations, all document examination within the laboratory; creating and implementing the questioned document training program; ensuring quality examinations by creating, implementing, and overseeing standard procedures within the question document section. I have over 20 years expert witness experience with consultations, depositions, and courtroom testimony.
I have spent over 25 years working as a Forensic Document Examiner with a particular focus in conducting examinations of domestic and international travel and identification documents to determine authenticity and reveal alterations. My examinations include, but are not limited to, microscopic, Ultraviolet (UV) and Infrared (IR) analysis, instrumental and comparative analysis of handwriting, typewriting, printing processes and stamp impressions. I have additional expertise in the detection of “cut and “paste” signatures in photocopies and nondestructive ink and paper differentiation. I have also spent more than 25 years as a document examiner expert witness in Maryland by providing consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 20 years of experience in the field of Forensic Document Examination with expertise in the examination of questioned documents. This examination includes the analysis and comparison of handwriting, hand printing, typewriting, commercial printing processes, photocopies, paper, inks, and other documentary evidence. These examinations determine identity, source, authenticity, alterations, additions, deletions, or other germane issues. I have over 20 years of expert witness experience with consultation, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 20 years experience in the field Real Estate with expertise in the Brokerage of Residential Real Estate. I have experience with new construction, broker ethics, document review, standards of care, pricing strategies, complicated sales, many of which require court proceedings in the following areas: trust, probate, divorce, bankruptcy, architectural homes, judicial foreclosure, conservatorship, and partition sales. I have prior expert witness experience with consultations and deposition.
I have more than 25 years experience as a forensic document examiner. I have served as a document examiner for law enforcement, a District Attorney’s Office, and an Auditor-Controller’s Office. I have prior expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have over 20 years experience with forensic document examination in government and private practice. I am the manager of a state crime laboratory and have instructed classes in forensic science at a state university, as well as qualified as an expert witness in State and Federal Courts. I have more than 25 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have 30 years experience as a forensic scientist and forensic document examiner, specializing in the scientific examination of questioned documents, disputed handwriting or hand printing, hand writing analysis, ink and paper analysis, printing process identification, computer printer or copier identification, writing instruments, ink differentiation, age determination, document dating, photocopy or computer printer dating, alterations, additions, deletions, sequence of production, indentations, trace evidence analysis, analysis of historical documents, counterfeits, and product piracy. I have prior expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 35 years experience in the field of Forensic Document Examination. My areas of expertise include development and decipherment; photocopier classification and identification; typewriting classification and identification; signature and handwriting identification/analysis; document dating and anachronism; detection of altered documents; computer-generated documents; decipherment of obliterations; photocopy manipulations; ink and paper analysis; and counterfeit detection. I have prior expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have over 20 years experience as a Public Accountant specializing in fraud detection and prevention, including fraud identification, forensic accounting, employee training, situational awareness, anti-fraud internal controls, safety, risk-management, deterrence, investigations, financial dispute resolution, damage calculations, audit resolutions, and fraud analysis. I also have experience in real estate accounting practices such as: budgeting / forecasting; management reporting; complex modeling; loan financing / administration; cash-flow analysis, valuation, audits, and debt restructuring; and contracts, property management, and litigation control. I have prior expert witness experience.
I have over 35 years experience specializing in ink differentiation and dating, paper analysis and dating, document dating, dating of photocopies, analysis of printing, trace evidence analysis, testing on textiles and dyestuffs, analysis of historical documents, as well as document examination determining record alteration, additions, obliterations, and sequence of entries. I have more than 10 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have over 35 years experience in latent fingerprint and document examination. My experience includes crime scene investigation, processing evidence items for latent fingerprints, examination of fingerprint evidence, and presentation of expert testimony in court. I am able to determine authenticity of signatures, handwriting analysis, signature & handwriting identification, restore erased or obliterated entries, and perform ink examination. I have more than 30 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 25 years experience in the field of Computer Forensics. My areas of expertise include software, forensic data acquisition, forensic data preservation, forensic computer investigation, computer crime, intellectual property, intellectual property theft of trade secrets, software valuation, computer security, infrastructure, and IS/IT. I have a broad background as a forensic computer examiner, computer forensic technician, software developer, and hardware, integrator involving computer equipment, support, software contracts, and outsourcing. I have prior expert witness experience.
I have more than 35 years experience in the field of Forensic Document Examination. My professional experience has included service as Chief, Questioned Documents, US CID (Criminal Investigations) Laboratory, Questioned Documents Examiner II, California Department of Justice, and Senior Questioned Document Analyst, Southern Region, U.S. Postal Crime Lab. I testified as an expert in the field of questioned documents in Justice, Municipal, Superior, Federal, and military courts and in Administrative Hearings. I have over 30 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, courtroom testimony.
I have more than 5 years experience in the field of Documents Examination with expertise in questioned signatures, altered documents, handwritings, legal contracts, court documents, anonymous writing, and graffiti. I have experience with disputed documents or questioned signatures on wills, checks, contracts, deeds, account ledgers, hand writing analysis, signature & handwriting identification, suspect documents, forgeries, identity theft, identity security, anonymous letters and writings, alterations, obliterations, erasures, typewritten documents, altered medical records, graffiti, handwritten numbers, computerized and/or handwritten documents, suicide notes, and autograph authentication. I have over 5 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I more than 40 years experience in the field of Forensic Linguistics with expertise in speech writing, ghost writing, manuscript editing, transcription, document examination, language libel, authorship analysis, plagiarism, and speaking prose and syntax. I have Over 30 years expert witness experience with consultations, depositions, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 30 years experience in the field of Forensic Document Examination with expertise in conducting scientific examinations of handwriting and physical examinations of documents to establish genuineness or spuriousness. I have experience with providing case review, on-site inspections, written reports, and lecturing and training personnel in document examination, fingerprint processing and photography.
I have more than 30 years experience in the field Escrow and Real Estate. Expertise includes escrow and title insurance services, escrow closing, lending and mortgage broker operations, including loan application and document review process, real estate contracts, contract disputes and litigation transactions. I have prior expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 25 years experience in the mortgage and finance industry. My expertise includes fraud prevention, fraud protection, and identifying irregular documentation. I have held top executive level positions within the banking industry concerning Savings and Loans, banks, mortgage brokers, and mortgage bankers on wholesale and retail systems. I have overseen the funding of billions of dollars in loans. My litigation support experience includes proper procedure in originating, processing, underwriting, and funding of loans. I have prior expert witness experience.
I have more than 30 years experience as an expert consultant in a wide variety of construction-related fields. My expertise includes building sites, facility assessments, forensic inspections and construction projects, testing and evaluation, scheduling, construction estimate preparation, construction document peer review, site-work, site inspections, and evaluations; code and materials review, cost and scheduling/delay analysis, development and management of remedial design recommendations utilized for cost estimating, repair and design/build applications. I have worked on construction, remodeling, and remedial repairs on large single-family and multi-family residential projects, multi-family apartment and condominium complexes. I over 15 years of expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have over 30 years experience in Document Examination and Forensic Handwriting Analysis. My expertise includes digital signatures; real estate transactions; corporate investigations; general civil litigation; medical malpractice; immigration matters; anonymous letters; sexual harassment; probate matters; criminal; family law; criminal defense; insurance fraud; development & decipherment of indented writings; photocopier classification & identification; signature & handwriting identification; signature & handwriting identification; document dating & anachronism; detection of altered documents; computer-generated documents; decipherment of obliterations; photocopy manipulations; ink & paper analyses; and counterfeit detection. I have prior expert witness experience.
I have over 10 years experience in the fields of forensic accounting and fraud examination. I am a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) with extensive experience in evidence documentation, detection of fraudulent financial statements, embezzlements, misappropriation of assets, and other suspicious financial activities. My expertise includes developing, implementing, and monitoring controls designed to reduce the risk of fraud and ensure accurate, internal controls and compliance, timely reporting. I have more than 10 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have more than 25 years experience in the field of Commercial Banking and Real Estate Lending with expertise in bank policies and procedures, banking regulations, construction lending, commercial loans, standard of care, standards of conduct, lender liability, hard money loans, loan disclosures, loan documentation, and fund control. I have additional experience with providing services to bank and non-bank clients by assisting them with loan development, structuring, placement and workout solutions, specializing in commercial real estate, construction, and SBA lending. I have over 5 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.
I have over 30 years of experience in architecture, engineering, and construction within the commercial, entertainment, and hospitality environments. I have forensic consulting experience with contracts; project design; details and planning; construction document analysis; and construction contract administration. My expertise includes architectural and construction defects, commercial Architecture, industry standard of care, scope of services, and building envelope design and failures. I am highly skilled at differentiating the responsibilities of owners, architects, and contractors, as well as managing client expectations. I have more than 5 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.