Election Expert’s Testimony Admitted in Voting Case

Expertise Description

Election or referendum in United States. Election expert witness holds envelope in hand above ballot. USA flags in background.The Virginia Department of Elections brought a motion to exclude the testimony of a proposed election expert witness for the plaintiffs—three individuals and two voluntary associations affiliated with the Republican Party of Virginia. The lawsuit challenged the constitutionality of the Incumbent Protection Act, which provides certain elected officials with the power to choose the method of nomination used to select their political party's nominee for office.The ExpertThe expert was a Professor of Public Policy, Political Science, and Law at the University of Southern California. Prior to joining USC, he taught at the University of Virginia for 10 years. His work focused on legislative politics and political parties and included more than 40 articles in peer-reviewed journals. The expert disclosure indicated that he would testify about the nomination process under state law and the Plan of Organization of the Virginia Republican Party, the structural advantages enjoyed by incumbent office holders, and the additional advantages conferred to incumbent officeholders.In forming his opinions related to this case, the expert relied heavily on rational choice institutionalism—a theory that posits that political outcomes are the product of preferences and institutions. Pursuant to this theory, the expert opined in his declaration that Virginia incumbents "have the ability to assess how they would perform under the different nomination methods and choose the one that they believe maximizes their chances of reelection." He stated that "the mere existence of the Act ... disadvantages challengers and benefits incumbents."Chief U.S. District Judge Michael F. Urbanski wrote in his opinion that in the question of whether a witness is qualified to testify is “context-driven and can only be determined by the nature of the opinion he offers,” citing Fourth Circuit precedent.Defendants argued that the expert should be excluded because his testimony was irrelevant and wouldn’t be helpful to the trier of fact. They argued that he lacked the requisite familiarity with the state electoral procedures at issue and that his definition of a "closed primary" contradicted the definition employed by federal courts in controlling cases.In support of their first argument, Defendants argued that the expert's academic background on national politics was inapplicable to this case, and he didn’t review sufficient Virginia-specific materials in forming his opinions. Defendants argued that the expert attempted “to parlay his research and familiarity as an expert on national politics into an expert opinion on Virginia election procedures and state party dynamics.”Plaintiffs responded that the election expert's expertise in rational choice institutionalism allows him to opine as to how those general principles apply to the facts of this case. According to plaintiffs, "courts do not require narrower and narrower sub-specialization ... in order to admit expert testimony into evidence."Defendants also argued that the expert didn’t sufficiently prepare to form his opinions on the subject matter of this case, which further revealed his lack of familiarity with the state’s electoral system. In preparing, the expert reviewed state election law (including the Act), forms promulgated by the Department of Elections, and other Party documents related to the selection of nomination methods. According to Defendants, those materials didn’t provide enough background on which the expert could have reliably formed his opinions. They contended that the expert should’ve reviewed other specific materials.Rule 702The judge reviewed the expert's proposed testimony, his qualifications, and preparation. He concluded the elections expert was qualified under Rule 702. As Defendants recognized, the expert had "significant experience with national political science." His proposed testimony applied general principles of rational choice institutionalism to the electoral procedures at issue. His testimony showed his familiarity with the Act and the Plan, he said, along with the sources at the center of the controversy. Although the expert didn’t consider every bit of evidence that Defendants considered important, "one need not be precisely informed about all details of the issues raised or even have prior experience with the particular subject the testimony concerns," Judge Urbanski wrote, quoting an earlier Circuit decision. Consequently, the judge found that the expert possessed the requisite background as a political scientist and adequately reviewed case-specific materials to offer his proposed testimony on the election issues in the case.Defendant also argued that the expert used a definition of a "closed primary" that was more restrictive than the definition relied on in Supreme Court cases, and therefore, this portion of his testimony wasn’t relevant. Because the expert's view of what constitutes a closed primary was more restrictive than the descriptions used by federal courts, Defendants argued that such a disagreement requires the court to exclude his testimony as irrelevant. However, Judge Urbanski disagreed.Defendants cited no authority for the proposition they sought to establish—that expert testimony is irrelevant if the witness disagrees with federal courts' definition of a term that describes an electoral procedure. But even assuming the definition of a "closed primary" amounts to a legal conclusion, the judge held that the experts' testimony would be admissible because it would help the trier of fact in resolving this case. Any disagreement over the definition of terms went to the weight of his testimony, not its admissibility. The expert' testimony about closed primaries wasn’t to be excluded.Finally, the conclusion to admit the expert's testimony was further bolstered by the fact that this case demanded a bench trial. The Daubert standards apply less stringently when the proposed expert testimony won’t be considered by a jury, the judge explained. While the lower Daubert standard wasn’t determinative here, Judge Urbanski said that it strengthened his conclusion that the testimony was admissible under Rule 702. 

Paddlesports Expert 530610 OR

Expertise Description

I have over 25 years experience in paddlesports with an expertise in beginner kayak instruction, instructor training (for kayak and raft), swift water rescue workshops, paddling expeditions, risk management associated with whitewater rafting, and wilderness first aid and rescue. I have spent more than 10 years offering consultations and deposition as a paddlesports expert witness.

Paddlesports Expert 530472 NC

Expertise Description

I have over 20 years experience in paddlesports with a particular focus in artificial whitewater parks, whitewater rafting and kayaking, flatwater paddling, and river guiding. I also have expertise in canoeing and other riversports. I am offering my services as a paddlesports expert witness.

Civil Engineering Expert 529733 MA

Expertise Description

I have over 30 years experience in civil engineering with expertise in control procedures, standardization of design and procedures, site investigations, cost estimates and schedules, project management and administration, construction claims and expert testimony, environmental permitting, civil engineering, and management of municipal, marine construction and dredging projects. I have provided my services as a civil engineering expert witness for more than 15 years with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.

Finance Expert 529674 TX

Expertise Description

I have over 20 years of consulting experience in finance with an emphasis in the payday loan industry. My areas of expertise include online payday loan, payday industry licensing, compliance, capital, acquisitions, capital, sales/acquisitions, and lobbying, procedures, and operations in the payday and auto title loan industry. I have prior experience offering my services as a finance expert witness.

Master Plumber Expert 522202 NY

Expertise Description

With more than 35 years experience in Plumbing & Fire Suppression, my expertise is in residential, commercial, and industrial plumbing, heating, and sprinkler systems. I have additional knowledge in fuel gas codes, backflow rules, DOB filing procedures and DAR filings. I am offering my services as a master plumber expert witness.

Herpetology & Law Enforcement Sacramento Expert 525703 AZ

Expertise Description

I have over 30 years experience in both law enforcement and herpetology with expertise in narcotics, firearms, man-tracking, law enforcement procedures and use-of-force. I have additional expertise in rattlesnake behavior; I perform my own transmitter surgeries, implanting small radio transmitters in the abdomens of rattlesnakes, venomous bites and stings, medically-significant injuries, avoiding envenomation, recognizing symptoms, and providing proper first aid. I have spent more than 30 years providing numerous clients with consultations and courtroom testimony as a law enforcement and herpetology expert witness.

IRS Expert 521812 CA(S)

Expertise Description

I have over 30 years experience as an Enrolled Agent with the IRS. My expertise consists of corporate, individual and partnership federal taxation laws, IRS operations, audits, procedural and institutional technical issues, administrative policies, and tax compliance. I have prior experience as an IRS expert witness.

Securities Industry Expert 523204 CT

Expertise Description

With more than 60 years of experience in the Securities Industry, I have an expertise in regulatory, sales practice and capital compliance, operations, clearing firm issues including liability, procedures, comparison and settlement and internal controls. I have spent over 35 years providing deposition, consultations, and courtroom testimony as a securities industry expert witness.

health care administration Expert 389033 TN

Expertise Description

I have more than 40 years experience in the field of Health Care Administration with expertise in providing legal advisory services and expert testimony in litigation. I have experience with directing day to day operations in facilities, establishing policies and procedures as well as standards and practices focused on patient safety, physician credentialing, labor relations practices, and compliance with Joint Commission Standards for Accreditation. I have over 5 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.

Law Enforcement Expert 501037 FL

Expertise Description

I have more than 25 years of experience analyzing, litigating, explaining and instructing in the area of law enforcement procedures. I served as an Assistant Prosecutor for 25 years. I have instructed thousands of law enforcement recruits and law enforcement officers on the criminal code, search and seizure, search and warrant, right to counsel, rules of courtroom evidence, identification evidence and use of force. I have argued a number of landmark cases that touch on law enforcement procedures. I received numerous awards and the highest marks as an instructor. My ability to explain complex legal matters to non-lawyers has given me the opportunity to testify as an expert in a jury trial on Use of Force training. I have also been proffered as an expert in electronic surveillance. I have prior expert witness experience.

Entertainment Industry Expert 163771 CA(N)

Expertise Description

I have over 40 years of experience in the entertainment industry. My expertise includes: the motion picture and entertainment industry, filmmaking, film production, television production, cinematography, directing, writing, editing, contracts, royalties, copyright infringement, and agency procedure. I have prior expert witness experience.

Human Factors And Ergonomics Expert 134991 NY

Expertise Description

I have over 40 years experience in Human Factors and Ergonomics. My expertise includes physics and human factors psychology to: vehicle accidents, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), industrial and construction accidents, perception and vision, warnings and instruction labels, product and equipment errors, medical equipment errors, skip and fall, ergonomics and workplace layout, physics and optics. I have conducted R&D in instructional system development, perception, vehicle driving, human-computer interaction, equipment design and evaluation, and physiological processes. My research includes an evaluation of a system to prevent drunk driving, an investigation of factors contributing to decreased alertness during driving, quality engineering, studies of camouflage, and programs requiring the design of operator interfaces. I develop manuals and multimedia training programs for industrial operations, health and safety, and maintenance for light to heavy industry. I have more than 30 years expert witness experience with consultations, deposition, and courtroom testimony.

Dismantlement Expert 501503 TX

Expertise Description

I have more than 40 years experience in the Petrochemical and Refining fields with expertise in the dismantlement of industrial facilities and industrial buildings. I have experience with decommissioning, demolition, explosives, dismantling, asbestos abatement, and asset recovery. My focus is on industrial facilities including petrochemical, oil & gas, refining, metals, power, manufacturing, mining, and also to categorize and strategically liquidate scrap metal and other surplus assets. I have provided consulting services with all aspects of the dismantling, demolition and asset recovery process, and am also an estimator. I have over 15 years expert witness experience with consultation, deposition, and courtroom testimony.

Health System Operations Expert 500853 TN

Expertise Description

I have more than 40 years experience in the field of Health System Operations with expertise in design and construction, facility and program accreditation, system integration, and managed care organization development. I have experience with TQM processes in systems design, facility design, organization quality improvement, productivity, financial management, physician collaboration, customer satisfaction, and governance effectiveness. I specialize in improving operational, financial, clinical and service performance, strategic planning, implementing growth, leadership development and facilitating cultural transformations.

Healthcare Law Expert 500453 OH

Expertise Description

I have 27 years of experience, and specialize in the field of disposable diapers with specific knowledge in the areas of manufacturing, product design and intellectual property. I have published on such topics as industry trends, product benchmarking and raw material issues. I have testified on patent infringement, product design and manufacturing process. Extensive connection with diaper industry executives. I have clients in 26 countries and have audited diaper factories everywhere, from large to small. I am also well connected with OEM's and raw material suppliers

Health Law Expert 500404 WA

Expertise Description

I have more than 25 years experience in the field of Health Law with expertise in health law, civil procedure, constitutional law, and the intersection of these fields. I have experience with fraud and abuse, regulatory compliance and reimbursement issues, managed care contracting, representation in administrative tribunals, medical staff and medical records/privacy issues. I also have experience with Medicare and Medicaid payment law and regulations with experience in regulatory affairs. I have prior expert witness experience.

Accident Reconstruction Expert 48214 CA(S)

Expertise Description

I have over 50 years experience in accident reconstruction and law enforcement practices and procedures. I have experience with accident reconstruction in all phases of vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle accident reconstruction, including but not limited to: accident analysis; accident causation; emergency vehicle accidents; vehicle and passenger dynamics; time / distance analysis; pedestrian collisions; photography; scale diagrams; scene management and evaluation; and trial exhibit preparation. My expertise includes all phases of emergency vehicle operation including police pursuits and Code 3 operation of police, fire, and other authorized emergency vehicles, including defensive driving. I have prior expert witness experience.

Employment Discrimination Expert 431630 CA(N)

Expertise Description

I have over 20 years of experience in the field of Criminal Justice. My extensive criminologist experience includes employment discrimination, environmental torts, death penalty appeals, criminology, criminal procedure, police organizations, community-oriented policing, coercion citizen compliance, risk management, patrols, drunk-driving enforcement, Criminal law, and criminal profiling.

Health Care Administration Expert 417770 TX

Expertise Description

I have over 10 years experience in the field of Health Care Administration. My expertise includes health services research, health services policy, management and organization, strategic planning, human resources, and employee engagement. I have prior expert witness experience.

Foodservice And Hospitality Expert 419629 CA(N)

Expertise Description

I have over 35 years experience in the field of Foodservice and Hospitality. My extensive experience includes turn around and restructuring, lease negotiation, commercial lease negotiations, best practices assessment, restaurant valuation and appraisal, investor procurement and relations, feasibility and concept viability, earnings potential, RFP bid process, loyalty and dining card programs, tip allocations, employee meals and benefits, management agreements and contracts, distressed properties, brand and concept obsolescence, brand development, reasonable care standards, loss future profits, orderly liquidation value (OLV) appraisal, and going out of business (GOB) analysis. I have more than 25 years of expert witness experience with consultation, deposition, and courtroom testimony.