Elevator & Escalator, +4
Retail
Loading
Review of Case Materials
Reviews records, documents, testimony, data, and other relevant materials and consults with counsel regarding technical issues related to the matter.
Provide Expert Analysis
Applies specialized knowledge and experience to evaluate the technical or professional issues involved.
Form Expert Opinions
Develops independent, supportable opinions based on the available evidence and relevant standards.
Prepare Expert Reports
Showing Results 0 of 0
Yes. A mechanical design can often be evaluated without the original CAD files by using available engineering drawings, specifications, physical measurements, photographs, inspection data, exemplar components, calculations, revision records, or three-dimensional scans. The absence of the native CAD model may limit certain analyses, but it does not necessarily prevent an expert from evaluating dimensions, interfaces, load paths, clearances, or other geometry relevant to the disputed condition.
Engineers can perform a tolerance analysis to determine how dimensional variations across mating parts combine within an assembly. Individual dimensions may each satisfy their specified limits while their combined variation produces insufficient clearance, excessive play, misalignment, or interference. Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing may also define allowable variation in form, orientation, location, and related geometric characteristics that affect assembly fit and function. ASME Y14.5 provides standardized rules for stating and interpreting these dimensional and geometric requirements.
A mechanical design can be verified through methods such as engineering calculations, analysis, inspection, demonstrations, prototype evaluation, and testing. The appropriate method depends on the requirement being evaluated, such as strength, movement, dimensional fit, temperature capability, or another performance characteristic. Verification compares the design or resulting product with defined requirements to determine whether those requirements have been satisfied.
Engineering change orders can help establish when a design concern was formally documented or when a change was proposed, reviewed, approved, or implemented. Revision histories, redlines, change requests, engineering change orders, and updated drawings may identify changes to dimensions, materials, interfaces, or other design requirements and may state why the change was made. These records should not be treated as proof of the first time anyone became aware of an issue unless the documentation specifically establishes that chronology.
Elevator & Escalator, +4
Retail
Automotive, +4
Automotive
Prepares clear, well-supported expert reports outlining methodology, analysis, findings, and opinions.
Provide Deposition Testimony
Explains findings and opinions under oath and responds to questioning during deposition testimony.
Testify in Court
Presents specialized findings and opinions clearly to judges, juries, arbitrators, or other decision-makers.
Engineering change records can establish the documented history of how a design changed over time. Revision histories, redlines, change requests, engineering change orders, and updated drawings may show changes to dimensions, materials, interfaces, or other requirements, along with approval and implementation dates. An expert can compare those records with manufacturing dates, serial or configuration information, and the disputed component to determine which documented design revision applied to the product at issue.
Ballistics And Firearms, +4
Manufacturing