H2O Asset Management Case: Key Legal Findings & Expert Witnesses in Financial Litigation

Emily Lou Steenwyk

February 05, 2025

Why Did the H2O Asset Management Case Become a Major Legal Issue?

The H2O Asset Management case is a significant financial dispute that underscores the risks of improper asset management, failure in due diligence, and lack of regulatory compliance.

H2O Asset Management, a European investment firm, invested heavily in illiquid, high-risk securities linked to controversial financier Lars Windhorst’s Tennor Group between April 2015 and November 2019. These investments raised serious concerns about financial transparency, investor risk exposure, and regulatory breaches.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) formally launched an investigation in 2021, which later confirmed misleading financial disclosures, conflicts of interest, and regulatory violations by H2O. In August 2024, H2O agreed to pay €250 million to investors and voluntarily plans to cancel its UK regulatory authorization by the end of the year.

While expert witnesses have not been publicly disclosed in this case, asset management disputes of this complexity often require forensic accountants, regulatory compliance experts, and investment fraud analysts to assess financial misconduct and support legal proceedings.

Timeline of the H2O Asset Management Investigation & Lawsuit

June 2019 – Media reports, notably by the Financial Times, expose H2O’s high exposure to illiquid assets and its close relationship with Lars Windhorst, leading to significant investor withdrawals.
August 2020 – The French regulator (AMF) orders the suspension of several H2O funds, citing valuation uncertainties and liquidity risks.
August 2024 – H2O agrees to a €250 million settlement with the FCA and announces plans to cancel its UK regulatory authorization by the end of the year.
December 2024 (Ongoing Legal Challenge) – A group of investors (Collectif Porteurs H2O) initiates a judicial review against the FCA’s settlement terms, arguing that the agreement does not fully compensate all affected investors.

This timeline illustrates how financial mismanagement cases can escalate, requiring expert witness analysis to navigate financial investigations and legal disputes.

Essential Facts for Legal Professionals & Financial Litigators

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigation identified significant regulatory breaches by H2O Asset Management, including:

Inadequate Due Diligence – Between April 2015 and November 2019, H2O failed to conduct proper due diligence on high-risk and illiquid investments linked to the Tennor Group and other entities introduced by financier Lars Windhorst.
Providing False and Misleading Information – The FCA found that H2O misled regulators by submitting inaccurate and falsified records, including fabricated meeting minutes and misleading statements about its investment processes.
Failure to Manage Transparency & Compliance Risks – The FCA identified over 50 instances of undisclosed hospitality, including the use of a superyacht and private jet by H2O employees. The firm failed to establish adequate policies to manage potential conflicts of interest.
Regulatory Breaches & Non-Compliance – H2O breached multiple FCA principles, including Principle 11, by failing to be open and cooperative with regulators. The firm provided false and misleading information during the investigation, worsening regulatory concerns.

These findings underscore the importance for legal professionals handling asset management litigation to engage expert witnesses who can assess issues such as misrepresentation, investment mismanagement, and financial risk assessment.

How Expert Witnesses Strengthen Financial Litigation Cases

While no specific expert witnesses have been publicly disclosed in the FCA's findings, cases of this complexity typically require specialized financial litigation experts, including:

Forensic Accounting Expert Witnesses
- Analyze fund valuations, cash flow patterns, and investment disclosures.
- Investigate whether financial misrepresentation occurred based on fund movement and reporting irregularities.
Asset Management Expert Witnesses
- Evaluate H2O’s risk management processes and determine if industry standards for handling illiquid securities were followed.
- Assess whether H2O’s investment decisions increased investor exposure to excessive risk.
Regulatory Compliance Expert Witnesses
- Examine whether H2O’s actions breached FCA regulations on due diligence, disclosures, and investor protections.
- Analyze transparency failures, including undisclosed hospitality and potential conflicts of interest.
Investment Fraud Expert Witnesses
- Investigate Lars Windhorst’s financial dealings and their direct impact on H2O’s asset mismanagement.
- Determine if investor losses resulted from fraud, negligence, or regulatory failures by assessing financial transactions, asset movements, and risk disclosures.

Expert witnesses play a crucial role in asset management disputes by providing forensic financial analysis and regulatory assessments, helping legal teams establish liability and causation in financial misconduct cases.

Critical Takeaways for Lawyers Handling Asset Management Disputes

What Can Lawyers and Litigators Learn From This Case?

Due Diligence is Essential – Asset managers must thoroughly investigate investment risks, especially with illiquid or high-risk securities.
Regulatory Compliance is Critical – Violating financial regulations can lead to severe legal and financial consequences.
Forensic Analysis Strengthens Litigation – Expert witness testimony enhances financial litigation cases by providing data-driven, factual evidence.
Transparency Protects Investors – Misleading financial disclosures can result in massive lawsuits and regulatory action.
Expert Witnesses Help Uncover Financial Misconduct – Attorneys should leverage forensic accountants, regulatory experts, and fraud analysts to build strong asset management cases.

Conclusion: Why This Case Matters in Financial Litigation

The H2O Asset Management case highlights critical lessons in asset management oversight, regulatory compliance, and the role of expert witnesses in financial litigation.

Regulatory scrutiny and legal proceedings emphasize the need for expert financial analysis to assess due diligence failures, misleading disclosures, and investor risk exposure.

For law firms handling investment fraud, asset mismanagement, and regulatory disputes, expert witness insights play a crucial role in establishing liability, investor restitution, and compliance violations.

Searching for the Best Asset Management Expert Witness?

Strengthen your financial litigation case with top-tier expert witness support from ForensisGroup.

We connect attorneys, litigators, and financial professionals with highly qualified asset management expert witnesses specializing in:

Investment Fraud & Asset Mismanagement Disputes
Financial Forensics & Regulatory Investigations (FCA, SEC, DOJ, FINRA)
Risk Management, Due Diligence, & Fiduciary Duty Cases

Our experts provide data-driven analysis and court-tested testimony to support legal teams in complex financial disputes. Whether assessing regulatory compliance, forensic accounting, or asset valuation, ForensisGroup ensures you have the right expertise for your case.

Consult with an expert witness today to gain the critical insights necessary to strengthen your legal strategy.