March 17, 2025
The Missing Witness Rule, also known as the Adverse Inference Rule, allows a court or jury to infer that a missing witness's testimony would have been unfavorable to the party that failed to call them. This legal principle helps ensure transparency in trials and discourages the strategic omission of crucial testimony.
While the rule can be a powerful tool in both civil and criminal cases, its application is nuanced. Courts must consider factors such as witness availability, relevance of testimony, and potential legal privileges before permitting an adverse inference.
In this guide, we’ll break down how the Missing Witness Rule works, when it applies, and how legal professionals can navigate its implications effectively.
The Missing Witness Rule allows judges and juries to assume that if a party fails to call a witness who would naturally support their case, it is likely because that witness's testimony would have been damaging.
This principle is rooted in fairness: if a party controls a witness who has material evidence and doesn’t present them, it raises suspicions. The rule serves as a deterrent against withholding unfavorable evidence while maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.
For example, if a construction company is sued for a breach of contract and does not call the project manager who oversaw the disputed work, the court may infer that the manager's testimony would have been detrimental to the company’s case.
Courts do not automatically assume an adverse inference when a witness is missing. Specific conditions must be met before applying the rule:
1. The Witness is Under the Control of the Party
The witness must be within the reasonable control of the party against whom the inference is sought. "Control" means that the witness is closely aligned with the party, making it reasonable to expect them to testify in favor of that party.
For example, a company’s former CEO might not be considered under its control if they are no longer associated with the business and refuse to cooperate.
2. The Witness’s Testimony is Material
The missing witness must have relevant information that would clarify key aspects of the case. If the testimony is deemed immaterial or merely supportive of already-established facts, the rule does not apply.
For example, if a plaintiff in a construction defect lawsuit fails to call a subcontractor who performed minor work unrelated to the alleged defect, no inference should be drawn.
3. The Testimony is Not Merely Cumulative
If other witnesses have already provided the same evidence that the missing witness would have given, their absence does not warrant an adverse inference. Courts avoid penalizing parties for not presenting redundant testimony.
4. No Reasonable Explanation for Absence
If the party provides a legitimate reason for not calling a witness—such as unavailability due to illness or legal privilege (attorney-client confidentiality)—then the Missing Witness Rule does not apply.
The Missing Witness Rule is not absolute. It does not apply in the following situations:
For attorneys, the Missing Witness Rule can be both a threat and an opportunity.
Defensive Strategy
If you anticipate that your opponent will argue for an adverse inference, consider:
Offensive Strategy
If your opponent fails to call a key witness, you can:
The Missing Witness Rule allows a jury to draw an adverse inference when a party fails to call a relevant witness—but only under specific conditions. Here’s a breakdown of when it applies and when it does not:
Witness is under the party’s control
Witness testimony is material
Testimony is not cumulative
Witness is equally available to both parties
Witness testimony is cumulative
Witness is unavailable for a valid reason
Why This Matters:
Understanding these conditions ensures proper use of the rule and avoids incorrect assumptions that could unfairly influence a case.
1. Can the Missing Witness Rule be used in criminal cases?
Yes, but its use is limited. Prosecutors cannot argue that a defendant’s failure to testify implies guilt, as this would violate the Fifth Amendment. However, they may use the rule if a key defense witness is missing without explanation.
2. What happens if both sides fail to call the same witness?
If a witness is equally available to both parties and neither calls them, the court typically does not permit an adverse inference against either side.
3. Can an expert witness fall under the Missing Witness Rule?
Yes. If one party has a retained expert but does not present their testimony, the court may infer that the expert’s conclusions were not favorable.
4. Does this rule apply in arbitration and administrative hearings?
While the Missing Witness Rule is most common in court trials, some arbitration and administrative proceedings recognize similar principles. However, arbitrators have more discretion in how they interpret missing testimony.
5. Can the rule be used against a party in a deposition?
No, the Missing Witness Rule is typically applied at trial. In depositions, a party may question why a witness is absent, but an adverse inference is generally not drawn until trial proceedings.
6. How can attorneys argue against an adverse inference?
Attorneys can prevent an adverse inference by:
By understanding the Missing Witness Rule, legal professionals can anticipate courtroom challenges and navigate cases more effectively. Whether leveraging it against an opponent or defending against its application, strategic planning is key.
Legal battles often hinge on expert testimony. At ForensisGroup, we provide over 3,000 rigorously vetted expert witnesses across various fields, including construction, breach of contract, and forensic analysis. With ForensisGroup, you gain access to experts who are qualified, credible, and prepared to withstand legal scrutiny.
Partner with ForensisGroup today to ensure your expert witness meets the highest standards and strengthens your case.
Visit ForensisGroup to find the right expert witness for your needs.